Datuk T Sex Scandal - Eskay dares Anwar to a lie-detector challenge

KUALA LUMPUR: Businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah is prepared to take a polygraph test to proof he was not lying about Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim being the man in the controversial Datuk T Sex video.

He said he would take the test, if Anwar also agreed to do so.

“I want the procedure to be shown live on TV. I want the world to see who is lying and who is not,” added Eskay, who had sworn in a mosque at Bandar Baru Sentul here last Friday that the man in the video was Anwar.

Datuk T Sex Video - Wan Azizah: Man in video is not Anwar

KUALA LUMPUR: PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail has insisted that the man in the sex video is not her husband Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Speaking at a press conference at her home in Segambut Dalam, she said she had watched the short sex tape video clip posted on Youtube on Monday with her family.

“It is not him. It is clear that the body and physique of the actor' in the video is extremely different from that of Anwar.

“This is strengthened by the fact that for over a year now he has been accompanied by his children whenever he exercises and undergoes physiotherapy as part of the recuperative measures for his injured spine,” she told a packed press conference.


At the press conference, Dr Wan Azizah, her daughter Nurul Izzah and DAP national chairman Karpal Singh also condemned the lack of action against the Datuk T trio and called for them to be arrested immediately.

In SIBU on Monday night, Anwar said the sex video may have caused PKR a few bruises ahead of the Sarawak state elections, but he would not be distracted by the allegations.

Datuk T Sex Video - Anwar was on Facebook.

There is one simple way to find out whether 'Datuk T's' pornographic video showing a look-alike of Anwar Ibrahim is a hoax, and that is to go to Anwar's Facebook from your own Facebook account and look for his entries at the time when the video was supposed to be recorded, which is 10:23pm to 10:45pm on Feb 21, 2011.

I just did that, and I found that Anwar made entries on that day at 10:40pm, 10:49pm, 10:50pm, for which he received nine comments, 17 comments, and eight comments respectively.

And thereafter, he made another seven entries, up till 11:28pm. The fact that Anwar was actually posting messages in Facebook at the relevant time clearly indicates that Anwar couldn't have been doing what was indicated in the video.

As jokingly exclaimed by Anwar during the press conference on Mar 21, hours after the exposure of the video: How could he be carrying out the sex act and typing on his computer at the same time?

Obviously, 'Datuk T' had neglected to look up Anwar's Facebook page before he launched his pornographic piece.

Questionable time frame

Purely on a technical level, another question that puzzled me was: How could so many acts be compressed into the purported duration of 22 minutes as indicated in the video?

Journalists who had viewed the video said that the love-making part lasted 17 minutes. This means that within the remaining five minutes, the following events had to be completed:
Pre-sex act:

Anwar look-alike (Mr X) walked into the room with the conductor who gave instruction to the prostitute who was already waiting there. The conductor left the room.
The couple undressed.
Woman went into the bathroom and took a bath, which should include wiping dry with a towel (the undressing and bathroom part of the video was skipped by 'Datuk T', but he said the woman took a bath).

Post-sex act:

Mr.X wiped his lower part with tissue, and went into the bathroom to clean himself, which presumably included washing and wiping dry with a towel.
Mr. X came out from the bathroom, dressed himself and walked off the room.

It should be obvious that when one tallies up the reasonable time allowed for completing each of these events, the total will far exceed five minutes. This conflict of time further undermines the credibility of the video clip.

Implausible plot

'Datuk T' said that the sex romp took place in a spa which provides sex in Kuala Lumpur.

Will anyone believe that opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim - who has been subjected incessantly to all sorts of cruel and unjust political persecution for the past 13 years, branded as enemy number one, for which the ruling power has been desperate to see that he is politically annihilated - would even condescend to walk into a place of such disrepute at the peak hours, where he would be instantly recognized by almost everyone present there, not to mention having sex with a prostitute in the same place?

Haven't 'Datuk T' and the plotters behind him overstretched their imagination, if they think the people would swallow such a story?